GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro FX 5800

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro FX 5800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Quadro FX 5800, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Quadro FX 5800 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro FX 5800
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	189 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 has 5% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 5800.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro FX 5800 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 5800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 605 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 5800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 5800 is 258 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 3 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	8−9	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−33	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	21−24	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	6−7
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	20−22
medium / 1080p	24−27	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro FX 5800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	45−50
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	130−140	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	4−5
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	55−60
medium / 1080p	50−55	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	18−20	6−7
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	80−85	50−55
medium / 768p	70−75	−
high / 1080p	27−30	9−10
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	50−55	18−20
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro FX 5800.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro FX 5800
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GF100	GT200B
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 May 2010	11 November 2008
Pipelines	352	240
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	610 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec	48.80
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops	622.1 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	102.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.2	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	1.3
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro FX 5800

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares