GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 263% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 470 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 197 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
1−2
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
130−140
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
2−3
low / 720p
95−100
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
80−85
40−45
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
1−2
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
5−6
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
12−14
medium / 768p
30−35
8−9
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF100
N14P-Q3
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
1 June 2012
Pipelines
352
384
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
23.84
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price