GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K2200M

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 has 207% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 548 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3409 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	30−33	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
QHD / 1440p	6−7	10−12
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	200−210	230−240
medium / 768p	170−180	200−210
ultra / 1080p	95−100	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	130−140	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	120−130
medium / 1080p	50−55	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	8−9	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	70−75	90−95
high / 1080p	27−30	40−45
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
QHD / 1440p	2−3	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	70−75
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	50−55	70−75
medium / 768p	30−35	45−50
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell
Code name	GF100	GM107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 May 2010	19 July 2014
Pipelines	352	640
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec	26.68
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.2	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.0
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares