GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro M3000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro M3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro M3000M.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 166% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M3000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 165 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
QHD / 1440p
6−7
35−40
4K / 2160p
5−6
18−20
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
250−260
medium / 768p
170−180
220−230
ultra / 1080p
95−100
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
130−140
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
95−100
180−190
medium / 1080p
50−55
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
8−9
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
140−150
medium / 768p
70−75
120−130
high / 1080p
27−30
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
130−140
medium / 768p
30−35
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
GF100
GM204
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
2 October 2015
Pipelines
352
1,024
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
67.20
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.2
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price