GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro P2000

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro P2000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro P2000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 has 166% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 139 MHz higher, than Quadro P2000.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Quadro P2000 is 192 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5405 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	8−9	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−33	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	50−55
QHD / 1440p	6−7	35−40
4K / 2160p	5−6	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	200−210	250−260
medium / 768p	170−180	220−230
ultra / 1080p	95−100	180−190
QHD / 1440p	50−55	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	130−140	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	16−18	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 152% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	95−100	180−190
medium / 1080p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	8−9	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	80−85	140−150
medium / 768p	70−75	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	9−10
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	50−55	130−140
medium / 768p	30−35	85−90
high / 1080p	18−20	50−55
ultra / 1080p	10−11	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	55−60
high / 768p	50−55	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro P2000
Architecture	Fermi	Pascal
Code name	GF100	GP106
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 May 2010	6 February 2017
Pipelines	352	1024
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost Clock		1480 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec	94.72
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops	3,031 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.19 kh/s
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro P2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares