GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro T1000

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro T1000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T1000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Quadro T1000

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro T1000
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins	None
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 has 300% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−33	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
QHD / 1440p	6−7	35−40
4K / 2160p	5−6	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	200−210	250−260
medium / 768p	170−180	220−230
ultra / 1080p	95−100	180−190
QHD / 1440p	50−55	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	130−140	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	16−18	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	95−100	180−190
medium / 1080p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	8−9	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	80−85	140−150
medium / 768p	70−75	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	2−3	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	50−55	130−140
medium / 768p	30−35	85−90
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro T1000
Architecture	Fermi	Turing
Code name	GF100	TU117
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 May 2010	27 May 2019
Pipelines	352
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost Clock		1455 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro T1000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares