GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon HD 8750M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon HD 8750M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8750M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon HD 8750M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon HD 8750M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 595 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8750M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
10−12
medium / 1080p
18−20
2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
2−3
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
110−120
medium / 768p
170−180
85−90
ultra / 1080p
95−100
35−40
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
10−11
high / 768p
130−140
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
40−45
ultra / 1080p
60−65
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
9−10
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
1−2
low / 720p
95−100
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
high / 1080p
24−27
2−3
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
14−16
medium / 1080p
27−30
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
low / 768p
80−85
40−45
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
3−4
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
high / 1080p
9−10
1−2
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
2−3
medium / 1080p
12−14
2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
3−4
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
low / 768p
50−55
7−8
medium / 768p
30−35
6−7
high / 1080p
18−20
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
high / 768p
50−55
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon HD 8750M
Architecture
Fermi
GCN
Code name
GF100
Mars Pro
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
16 November 2012
Pipelines
352
384
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
620 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
18.60
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
595.2 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
2000 - 4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
71 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
