GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega M GL, check out specs charts below.
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 207% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 284 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 203 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
QHD / 1440p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
220−230
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−33
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−12
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
medium / 768p
70−75
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
40−45
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 4.0
Code name
GF100
Polaris 22
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
1 February 2018
Pipelines
352
1280
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
80.88
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
2,588 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
