GeForce GTX 465 vs Tesla C2075

When comparing GeForce GTX 465 and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 23% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 641 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 465 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 239 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1529 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	30−33	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	6−7	6−7
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	200−210	210−220
medium / 768p	170−180	190−200
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
QHD / 1440p	50−55	65−70
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	130−140	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	110−120
medium / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	8−9	10−11
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	80−85	90−95
medium / 768p	70−75	80−85
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF100	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 May 2010	25 July 2011
Pipelines	352	448
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec	32.14
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares