GeForce GTX 465 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Tesla M2070 Q has 12% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 641 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
GeForce GTX 465 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla M2070 Q is 239 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1529 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
21−24
8−9
ultra / 1080p
20−22
6−7
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
100−110
ultra / 1080p
95−100
50−55
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
95−100
60−65
medium / 1080p
50−55
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
24−27
8−9
ultra / 1080p
18−20
7−8
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
80−85
50−55
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
9−10
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
70−75
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
50−55
20−22
medium / 768p
30−35
12−14
high / 1080p
18−20
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
30−35
18−20
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Code name
GF100
GF100
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
352
448
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
1,027.7 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
