GeForce GTX 470 vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 470 and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 470 and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 470
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
215 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1280 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 470 has 186% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 470 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 470 has 1276 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 470 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 470 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 470 is 561 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1126 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 470.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
21−24
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−33
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Battlefield 5 is 112% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 470 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
220−230
140−150
medium / 768p
180−190
120−130
ultra / 1080p
100−110
55−60
QHD / 1440p
60−65
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−35
27−30
high / 768p
150−160
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
medium / 768p
95−100
65−70
ultra / 1080p
65−70
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
18−20
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
100−110
65−70
medium / 1080p
55−60
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
2−3
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−35
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
55−60
medium / 768p
80−85
50−55
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 81% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
27−30
medium / 768p
35−40
18−20
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 470
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF100
N14E-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 April 2010
1 June 2012
Pipelines
448
576
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
34.0 billion/sec
31.39
Floating-point performance
1,088.6 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
320 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
133.9 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
448
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
97 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price