GeForce GTX 470M vs Tesla M60
When choosing between GeForce GTX 470M and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 470M and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
GeForce GTX 470M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 470M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 470M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 470M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 470M.
- GeForce GTX 470M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 470M has 1528 GB more memory, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 470M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 470M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 470M is 543 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3762 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 470M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 284% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 169% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 312% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 276% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 470M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N11E-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 November 2010 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 288 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.7 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 616.3 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |