GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 480M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 480M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 136% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 480M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 480M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 871 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 480M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M SLI is 93 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 480M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 480M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 480M SLI | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200 | N11E-GTX-A3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 25 May 2010 |
Pipelines | 240 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 425 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 6000 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon Pro 455
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 470M SLI
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Radeon Pro 455
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs GeForce GTX 470M SLI