GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 480M SLI will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 62 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI has 61% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Quadro 2000D are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Quadro 2000D are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Minecraft is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | N11E-GTX-A3 | GF106 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 May 2010 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 704 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 425 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 6000 Million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |