GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 480M SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 149 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1932 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Fortnite is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in World of Tanks is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | N11E-GTX-A3 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 May 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 704 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 425 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 6000 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |