FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 480M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 480M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 480M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 480M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 480M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 480M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 480M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M is 225 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 480M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 786 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Battlefield 5 is 144% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Fortnite is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in World of Tanks is 25% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | N11E-GTX-A3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 25 May 2010 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 352 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 18.7 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |