GeForce GTX 480M vs GRID K520
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 480M and GRID K520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 480M will be the best choice, for others GRID K520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 480M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 480M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 480M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 480M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | N11E-GTX-A3 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 May 2010 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 352 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.7 billion/sec | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |