GeForce GTX 480M vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 480M and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 480M and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 480M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 480M and Tesla C2070 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 480M and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1788 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 480M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GTX-A3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 May 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 352 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.7 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |