GeForce GTX 480M vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 480M and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 480M will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 480M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 480M has 42% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 480M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 480M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M is 265 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 480M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | N11E-GTX-A3 | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 May 2010 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 352 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.7 billion/sec | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |