FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 485M
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 485M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 485M.
FirePro W5100
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 485M has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 485M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 485M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 485M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 546 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 485M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and GeForce GTX 485M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Bonaire | N12E-GTX-A1 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 6 January 2010 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 384 |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 36.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon R7 260X
- GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Iris Graphics 550
- FirePro W5100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655