FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 485M
When comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 485M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 485M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 485M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 485M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 485M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 440 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 485M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Hawaii | N12E-GTX-A1 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 6 January 2010 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 384 |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 36.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Iris Graphics 550
- FirePro W8100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655