GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 485M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 485M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 485M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 485M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 485M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 485M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 395 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 485M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and GeForce GTX 485M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF114 | N12E-GTX-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 6 January 2010 |
Pipelines | 336 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 384 |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 36.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655