GeForce GTX 485M vs GRID K160Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and GRID K160Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 485M stacks up against GRID K160Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 466 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 282 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 575% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 182% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2100% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 70% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 384 | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |