GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When comparing GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 485M has 122% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 485M is 184 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 485M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
160−170
medium / 768p
150−160
130−140
ultra / 1080p
80−85
65−70
QHD / 1440p
45−50
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
80−85
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
65−70
55−60
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
8−9
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−11
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
85−90
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
20−22
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
40−45
30−35
medium / 768p
27−30
21−24
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−33
24−27
high / 768p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N12E-GTX-A1
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
6 January 2010
5 June 2013
Pipelines
384
40
Core clock speed
384
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
36.8 billion/sec
52.00
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price