GeForce GTX 485M vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 485M and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 8% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 216 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 575% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 566% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 182% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 383% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 2100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1000% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 833% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2010 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 384 | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |