GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon Pro Vega 16, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 485M stacks up against Radeon Pro Vega 16, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 485M has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M.
GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro Vega 16 is 900 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
QHD / 1440p
3−4
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
180−190
240−250
medium / 768p
150−160
210−220
ultra / 1080p
80−85
130−140
QHD / 1440p
45−50
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−33
60−65
high / 768p
120−130
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
80−85
110−120
ultra / 1080p
50−55
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
5−6
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
high / 1080p
21−24
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
85−90
130−140
medium / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
high / 1080p
21−24
40−45
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
20−22
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
high / 1080p
8−9
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
40−45
85−90
medium / 768p
27−30
55−60
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
45−50
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Fermi
Vega
Code name
N12E-GTX-A1
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
6 January 2010
15 November 2018
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
384
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.8 billion/sec
76.16
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96.0 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price