GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 485M has 185% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 4500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
180−190
140−150
medium / 768p
150−160
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
55−60
QHD / 1440p
45−50
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
120−130
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
low / 720p
85−90
65−70
medium / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
65−70
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
10−11
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
40−45
27−30
medium / 768p
27−30
18−20
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−33
21−24
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
N12E-GTX-A1
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
6 January 2010
21 March 2018
Pipelines
384
512
Core clock speed
384
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
36.8 billion/sec
39.01
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96.0 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
