GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 485M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 516 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 35% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 January 2010 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 384 | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |