GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 341 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 485M is 375 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 January 2010 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 384 | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Graphics 550
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370