GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560 Ti will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 560 Ti has 1033% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 Ti is 522 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
7−8
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
110−120
medium / 768p
180−190
85−90
ultra / 1080p
100−110
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−35
−
high / 768p
140−150
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
70−75
medium / 768p
95−100
45−50
ultra / 1080p
65−70
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
6−7
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
20−22
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Fortnite is 136% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
27−30
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
55−60
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−33
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
40−45
medium / 768p
75−80
35−40
high / 1080p
30−35
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
10−11
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
16−18
medium / 768p
35−40
12−14
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
GF114
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
25 January 2011
2 June 2015
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
822 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
52.67
40.80
Floating-point performance
1,263.4 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
229 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2004 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
87 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.39 Gh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price