GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Quadro K4200

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560 Ti will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 Ti has 57% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 Ti is 51 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 12 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 3396 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	30−33
QHD / 1440p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	6−7	9−10
low / 720p	50−55	70−75
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	210−220	230−240
medium / 768p	180−190	200−210
ultra / 1080p	100−110	120−130
QHD / 1440p	50−55	100−105
4K / 2160p	30−35	55−60
high / 768p	140−150	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	20−22
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	20−22	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	100−110	130−140
medium / 1080p	55−60	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	27−30	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
QHD / 1440p	9−10	16−18
4K / 2160p	9−10	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	70−75
medium / 1080p	30−33	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	30−35	40−45
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	30−33	40−45
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
medium / 768p	35−40	50−55
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K4200.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Quadro K4200
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Code name	GF114	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 January 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	384	1344
Core clock speed	822 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	52.67	87.81
Floating-point performance	1,263.4 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	229 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.3 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	2.1	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	87 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)	0.39 Gh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares