GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Quadro P2000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Quadro P2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 560 Ti stacks up against Quadro P2000, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti Check Price

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	5 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 Ti has 126% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 254 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is 28 mm longer, than Quadro P2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5004 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	24−27	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	50−55
QHD / 1440p	8−9	35−40
4K / 2160p	6−7	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	220−230
ultra / 1080p	100−110	180−190
QHD / 1440p	50−55	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−35	70−75
high / 768p	140−150	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−33
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	80−85
medium / 1080p	20−22	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	50−55
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	100−110	180−190
medium / 1080p	55−60	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 97% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	27−30	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
QHD / 1440p	9−10	30−35
4K / 2160p	9−10	24−27
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	30−33	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	85−90	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	30−35	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	9−10
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	30−33	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	55−60	130−140
medium / 768p	35−40	85−90
high / 1080p	20−22	50−55
ultra / 1080p	10−12	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	55−60
high / 768p	55−60	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 560 Ti	Quadro P2000
Architecture	Fermi	Pascal
Code name	GF114	GP106
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 January 2011	6 February 2017
Pipelines	384	1024
Core clock speed	822 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost Clock		1480 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	52.67	94.72
Floating-point performance	1,263.4 gflops	3,031 gflops
Length	229 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.3 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.19 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	87 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)	0.39 Gh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Quadro P2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares