GeForce GTX 560 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 560 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 560 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 560 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 560 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 is 510 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 560 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
7−8
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Battlefield 5 is 172% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 560 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
110−120
medium / 768p
170−180
85−90
ultra / 1080p
90−95
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
4K / 2160p
5−6
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Far Cry 5 is 157% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Fortnite is 104% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
40−45
medium / 768p
70−75
35−40
high / 1080p
27−30
8−9
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
24−27
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
8−9
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
16−18
medium / 768p
30−35
12−14
high / 1080p
16−18
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−105
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
GF114
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
17 May 2011
2 June 2015
Pipelines
336
48
Core clock speed
810 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
45.36
40.80
Floating-point performance
1,088.6 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
8.25" (21 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.1
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
80 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
