FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 560M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 560M SLI.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M SLI is 150 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 560M SLI - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 736 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Dota 2 is 78% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Fortnite is 164% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 237% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M SLI in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
Code name | RV770 | N12E-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs GeForce GT 650M
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs FirePro W5100
- FireStream 9250 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs FirePro W5100
- GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire