FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 560M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 560M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 560M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 560M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 85 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 560M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Juniper | N12E-GS |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 30 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 24.8 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |