FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 560M
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 560M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1534 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 25 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 560M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2350 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Code name | RV770 | N12E-GS |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 30 May 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 24.8 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |