FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 560M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 560M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 560M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 560M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1532 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 560M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 560M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 50 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 560M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3350 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 560M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 154% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 560M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Cypress | N12E-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 30 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 24.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 560M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 560M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 7850M
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GT 750M
- GeForce GTX 560M vs Radeon HD 7850M
- GeForce GTX 560M vs GeForce GT 750M