GeForce GTX 560M vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560M will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1535 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 75 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 532 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Fortnite is 65% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Minecraft is 5% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 333% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |