GeForce GTX 560M vs GRID M10 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 560M and GRID M10 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and GRID M10 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1528 GB more memory, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 258 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M10 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3950 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 560M and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 154% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |