GeForce GTX 560M vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
When comparing GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M or Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
200−210
medium / 768p
100−110
170−180
ultra / 1080p
50−55
90−95
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
12−14
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
90−95
ultra / 1080p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
0−1
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
90−95
medium / 1080p
18−20
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
medium / 720p
45−50
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
3−4
9−10
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
10−11
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 154% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
20−22
50−55
medium / 768p
12−14
30−35
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
75−80
100−105
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
N12E-GS
Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
30 May 2011
28 May 2019
Pipelines
192
64
Core clock speed
775 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
24.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
595.2 gflops
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price