GeForce GTX 560M vs P104 100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 560M and P104 100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and P104 100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
P104 100
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1532 GB more memory, than P104 100.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 832 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8758 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 328% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GP104 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |