GeForce GTX 560M vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 560M has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 560M has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 125 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
10−12
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
medium / 720p
45−50
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
20−22
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
N12E-GS
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
30 May 2011
8 August 2016
Pipelines
192
1024
Core clock speed
775 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
24.8 billion/sec
58.05
Floating-point performance
595.2 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
