GeForce GTX 560M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1530 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2070 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 201 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1738 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | N12E-GS | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |