GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
134 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 123% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 520 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
1−2
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
−
30−33
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
210−220
medium / 768p
27−30
180−190
ultra / 1080p
7−8
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
60−65
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
16−18
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 489% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
low / 768p
18−20
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
0−1
60−65
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Architecture
G9x
Kepler
Code name
N10E-GS1
GK106
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
2 March 2009
26 March 2013
Pipelines
64
768
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
144.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
64
768
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
2-way
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price