GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs GRID K160Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and GRID K160Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost stacks up against GRID K160Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K160Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GRID K160Q
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
130 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 3% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and GRID K160Q are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 130 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 1776 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
9−10
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
9−10
medium / 1080p
21−24
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 440% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
1−2
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
8−9
medium / 1080p
30−33
2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
100−110
medium / 768p
180−190
75−80
ultra / 1080p
100−110
30−35
QHD / 1440p
60−65
−
4K / 2160p
30−35
9−10
high / 768p
150−160
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
10−12
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
110−120
65−70
medium / 768p
100−110
35−40
ultra / 1080p
70−75
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 142% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
20−22
0−1
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
6−7
medium / 1080p
21−24
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
low / 720p
100−110
40−45
medium / 1080p
60−65
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 260% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
27−30
0−1
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
low / 720p
55−60
10−12
medium / 1080p
30−35
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
90−95
35−40
medium / 768p
80−85
−
high / 1080p
30−35
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 148% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
10−11
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
50−55
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
1−2
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
60−65
3−4
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
21−24
2−3
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p
90−95
65−70
medium / 768p
60−65
30−35
ultra / 1080p
35−40
10−11
high / 768p
55−60
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K160Q.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GRID K160Q
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK106
GK107
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
28 June 2013
Pipelines
768
192
Core clock speed
980 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
13.60
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
28.51 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Check Price
