GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro FX 4800
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro FX 4800
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
150 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1536 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Quadro FX 4800 has 11% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 378 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 4800 is 258 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 1594 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
9−10
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
14−16
medium / 1080p
30−33
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
180−190
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
35−40
QHD / 1440p
60−65
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−35
16−18
high / 768p
150−160
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
70−75
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p
20−22
2−3
ultra / 1080p
18−20
2−3
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
10−11
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
12−14
3−4
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
60−65
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p
27−30
5−6
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
55−60
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−35
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
80−85
−
high / 1080p
30−35
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p
10−11
1−2
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
4−5
medium / 1080p
14−16
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
30−35
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
60−65
9−10
medium / 768p
35−40
8−9
high / 1080p
21−24
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
12−14
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro FX 4800
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Code name
GK106
GT200B
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
11 November 2008
Pipelines
768
192
Core clock speed
980 MHz
602 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
38.53
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
462.3 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
267 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
4.0
OpenGL
4.3
3.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
1.3
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Check Price
