GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro M2200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2200.
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M2200
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 143% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 286 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 5502 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
30−33
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
240−250
medium / 768p
180−190
210−220
ultra / 1080p
100−110
130−140
QHD / 1440p
60−65
100−110
4K / 2160p
30−35
55−60
high / 768p
150−160
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
18−20
21−24
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
60−65
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−33
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
100−110
high / 1080p
30−35
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M2200
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK106
N17P-Q3
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
13 January 2017
Pipelines
768
1024
Core clock speed
980 MHz
694 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1038 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5508 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
88 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
3D Stereo
+
Check Price
Check Price
