GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon HD 6950M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6950M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6950M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon HD 6950M
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 168% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6950M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 6950M is 894 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
8−9
ultra / 1080p
9−10
5−6
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
20−22
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−33
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
210−220
150−160
medium / 768p
180−190
120−130
ultra / 1080p
100−110
65−70
QHD / 1440p
60−65
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−35
27−30
high / 768p
150−160
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
65−70
ultra / 1080p
70−75
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
high / 1080p
20−22
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
9−10
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
−
low / 720p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 63% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
high / 1080p
27−30
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
3−4
low / 720p
55−60
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
90−95
60−65
medium / 768p
80−85
50−55
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
high / 1080p
10−11
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
60−65
30−35
medium / 768p
35−40
21−24
high / 1080p
21−24
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 19% more, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon HD 6950M
Architecture
Kepler
Terascale 2
Code name
GK106
Blackcomb Pro
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
6 January 2011
Pipelines
768
960
Core clock speed
980 MHz
580 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
27.84
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
1,113.6 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
115.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
