GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2x2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 265 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is 894 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
6−7
35−40
4K / 2160p
5−6
18−20
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
250−260
medium / 768p
180−190
220−230
ultra / 1080p
100−110
180−190
QHD / 1440p
60−65
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−35
70−75
high / 768p
150−160
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
12−14
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
100−110
180−190
medium / 1080p
60−65
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−11
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
140−150
medium / 768p
80−85
120−130
high / 1080p
30−35
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
130−140
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
21−24
45−50
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Architecture
Kepler
Terascale 2
Code name
GK106
Blackcomb XTX
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
12 July 2011
Pipelines
768
2240
Core clock speed
980 MHz
715 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
2x1700 Million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price