GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro 555
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 78% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 5074 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
30−33
27−30
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
210−220
210−220
medium / 768p
180−190
180−190
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
QHD / 1440p
60−65
55−60
4K / 2160p
30−35
30−35
high / 768p
150−160
140−150
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
20−22
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
QHD / 1440p
18−20
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
100−110
medium / 1080p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 2% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
80−85
80−85
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
21−24
20−22
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon Pro 555
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK106
Polaris 21
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
5 June 2017
Pipelines
768
768
Core clock speed
980 MHz
855 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
1,306 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
81.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
